Overall, it looks like you really polished this since the last round.
Will it be okay to leave the vertical axis as is? I added a gradient at the billion mark to help accentuate the difference as well.
Still needs to be some visual indication of the monetary change. You do need to acknowledge in some way that the angle of the graph is not perfectly smooth/diagonal - visualize the jump from 480 million to 1 billion -- not only in the background, but also on the two graphs that cross that threshold.
Also, the beginning of your billion scale currently looks like 2 billion increments and therefore would mean it starts at 0 billion?? Scale does need to start at 1 billion - then could be 1 billion increments.
Also - where the second scale is on the graph is where the infographic will begin on the last spread. Do you think the placement is okay?
Yes, I think this is good placement. Will have to see how it interacts with your editorial spreads then.
1 comment:
Overall, it looks like you really polished this since the last round.
Will it be okay to leave the vertical axis as is? I added a gradient at the billion mark to help accentuate the difference as well.
Still needs to be some visual indication of the monetary change. You do need to acknowledge in some way that the angle of the graph is not perfectly smooth/diagonal - visualize the jump from 480 million to 1 billion -- not only in the background, but also on the two graphs that cross that threshold.
Also, the beginning of your billion scale currently looks like 2 billion increments and therefore would mean it starts at 0 billion??
Scale does need to start at 1 billion - then could be 1 billion increments.
Also - where the second scale is on the graph is where the infographic will begin on the last spread. Do you think the placement is okay?
Yes, I think this is good placement. Will have to see how it interacts with your editorial spreads then.
Post a Comment